I have recently done a set of comparisons between writing sites, using Compete.Com. The facts are surprising.
Expertscolumn is the ONLY writing site which has ascending during the past year.
Triond declined from above 200k hits to less than 100k in one year.
Hubpages counts its hits in the MILLIONS. It began at under 7 Million in May 2011, reached over 10 Million in October, began falling and is just above 8 Million today.
Wikinut, Bukisa, Knoji; all the known writing sites have declined, some by more than half.
Only Experts Column has gone from under Forty Thousand to over One Hundred Thousand in an inexorable rise.
Why?
What has Expertscolumn been doing right that the other publishing sites are doing wrong? Or what are they doing wrong?
1) Rip Off
Knoji has proven itself to be a major rip off within the first two months of its existence. Writers have become rather sophisticated over the past few years. The first mistake is the last. Knoji is a rip off. Hits and payments decline, not increase.
2) Irregular and Bad Pay
Wikinut pays badly, especially considering the effort required to gain a 'Star' page. Owned by an absentee landlord called 'Chief Nut' who no one has seen in years, it is clear that he has no interest in the site, in the writers and pays as infrequently and badly as he can.
3) No Community
One is very alone on sites like Triond, Bukisa, etc. There is no one there, no one cares. The drop in hits on Triond is direcly linked to this.
4) Low quality
The publishing of crap and the response of Google's Search Engine means that anything posted on what is called a Content Farm will be negatively rated. To put it into numbers, if you write on Triond, even if your title and keywords perfectly match searches, your article will be at the bottom of the list because starting on Triond one begins with a minus score.
So far, Expertsdolumn has been able to evade the errors made by others. Good Work!

Comments
very true, I don't know if I will be paid by wiki ever and you are right- absentee admin. of wikinut he he
Wiki actually does pay, about 4 times a year. A few pennies.
I hate Triond and will never attempt to write for them again. My one and only attempt was an article that was 100% original and they sent it back to me claiming it was plagiarized. They didn't tell me how it was plagiarized, or give me a link to the supposedly same article. If any of it matched something else word for word, it was completely by accident, and I could have fixed it by rewording something. But I can't really do that if their editors don't give me any explanation. It really pissed me off and I knew I was never using that site again.
I once did an extensive well researched piece with attribution and quotes. It was rejected as being 'too like' another article...(the quotes). So I removed the quotes, dumbed it down, and it was accepted and published.
I've all but given up with Triond and I feel they ought to do something to address the poorly written, inaccurate articles on there as everyone gets penalised for them. I've all but given up with Triond, but my experiences with Expertscolumn have been positive.
When Triond was about to be slapped down for being a Content Farm, they implemented a program in which users were to flag the articles of other users. Maybe they thought all the users would run around and flag and they could pay a few pennies for every 100 or so...but most users couldn't b bothered so they went down the tubes.
A writing site needs a hands on moderator and an owner who is somewhrre around.
I just hope that expertscolumn will not fall on the pit as what bukisa and triond in to now. wikinut is my lowest money generating site as of now.
Depends on the Owner of the Site. For example, Triond, Bukisa, Wikinut; their owners couldn't care less. They put no work into their sites, pay no one to manage them;
unpaid mods, as on Wikinut, play with each other, pushing their garbage to the top,
on Bukisa, trainee web designers redo the site so that it doesn't work;
and on Triond, the owner only collects his advertising cash and has a day job.
thanks for info
well, I love to read your review related to expertscolumn and other competitors.
I think those who write on line should adopt it as their duty to alert or warn others so as to protect them from sites which rip them off.
I truly profit from your writing experience, research acumen, and acute wisdom. I'm now considered "eccentric" at Wiki for raising a howl in the "normal" course of events there...lol.
Thanks, my dear friend.
Glad it dawned on me that's you.:-)
Great you're here and really am for your guidance and general expertise.
Buzzy boy
I published some excellent items on Wikinut which I will, over time rework for Experts column. I will say that I publish one item, (maybe) per week there, and marvel at how a Moderator ALWAYS has his garbage given a Star.
Thank you for providing this information.
I find compete.com very usful in checking sites. Traffic is important. Yes, Hubpages, which has millions of visitors can lose 1 M and not notice. But sites which have 60k can't afford to lose 10k